Subject matters for the training events were as follows:
1. Verbal and non-verbal communication developing. Empathy developing;
2. Active oral comprehension technique developing. Feed-back;
3. The developing of the technique of constructive critique. Management and communicating (Personal management);
4. Conflictology;
5. Conflicts and ways out;
6. Emotional indifference. Professional deformation.
7. Emotional control (self controling);
8. “Aggression reducing”. Art-therapy method training;
9. Public speaking art;
10. Talking in public.
The seminar was held by:
1. Kurbanovа А.О. – the leading expert of the Center of Communicative Skills, the assistant for the Department of communicative skills, basics of psychotherapy, general and medical psychology;
2. Shein P.V. – the leading expert of the Center of Communicative Skills, the assistant for the Department of communicative skills, basics of psychotherapy, general and medical psychology
The trainings participants survey results: the member of participants -21 persons; the member of respondents – 10 Deputy Faculty Heads.
The assessments were as follows:
| 1. | Total evaluation– «excellent» | 10 people (100 %) | ||||
| 2. | The trainings were interesting
|
«yes» | 6 people (60%) | |||
| «very interesting» | 4 people (40%) | |||||
| 3. | The materials presented
Р.S. as the most valuable aspects were pointed to: conflictology, communication competence, the possibility to know others’ opinions about myself. |
easy to again and understand | 10 people (100 %) | |||
| helpful | «100%» | 4 people (40 %) | ||||
| «very» | 5 people (30 %) | |||||
| priceless | 1 person (10 %) | |||||
| 4. | Convenient atmosphere and the tempo of presentation | « 100 %» | 6 people (60 %) | |||
| «80 %» | 1 person (10 %) | |||||
| «very comfortable» | 3 people (30 %) | |||||
| 5. | Recommendations to improve the trainers work: | no recommendations | 7 people (70 %) | |||
| «high level» | 1 person (10 %) | |||||
| «remarkable trainers» | 1 person (10 %) | |||||
| arrange the seminars more frequently | 1 person (10 %) | |||||
| 6. | Subjects to study in details: | «every thing» | 1 person (10 %) | |||
| «every topic you can offer» | 1 person (10 %) | |||||
| Conflictology | 4 people (40 %) | |||||
| emotional indifference | 1 person (10 %) | |||||
| giving a talk in public | 3 people (30 %) | |||||
| 7. | Would you like to recommend such training to your colleges? | «yes» — 10 people (100 %) | ||||
| 7.1 | If «YES», why? | It is necessary to everybody. Good psychological relaxation (alleviation) | 3 people (30 %) | |||
| help for professional activity (exchange of ideas, making communication skills perfect) | 7 people (70 %) | |||||
The trainers commentaries.
Kurbanovа А.О.
I was very much pleased to see that our Deputy Faculty Heads demonstrated the high levels of empathy during the second training events. I had a question “is the problems our students have while they contact with Deputy Faculty Heads? What can I teach them if they have such a high level empathy? ”
But during the next meeting I understand what the problem is. Our charming fall of empathy Deputy Heads are terribly worried about their students and do their best to be Moms and Dads. The conflict is: students don’t need such parents, they need the assistance of an adult partner and friend. I hope that the listeners could realize this idea during our studies. But this is only the first step to reach our goal.
I should also that I was very much delighted by the listeners’ work at the training event “Art-therapy. Let’s draw aggression”. They because keen on their work and their images, they were open-hearted and sincere; they worked actively, fruitfully, harmoniously. It was very nice to see sincere people who could so easily become small children: they were crawling on the carpet, painted masks with their fingers, created fairy-tales, laughed and discussed their tales so emotionally. Their eyes were shining! It’s an unforgettable memory!
Shein P.V.
I had a chance to conduct a seminar the problems I had planned to present were “Communication competence”, “Professional deformation of the personality”, “emotional indifference”. But during the work at the seminar, it because clear that the listeners rather possess communicative competence and empathy but it is necessary for them to get some psychotherapy help as there is high level of anxiety and there are cases to of sub-depressive and psychosomatic states.
As I see it the training turned to become the chain of psychotherapy classes to work on a lot of problems and situations. It became clear that most participants had “’parents’ attitude”, towards their students.
